|
I realized recently that “good enough” and “giving up” are not the same thing.
For a long time, I thought everything had to be perfectly aligned before I could move forward. Perfect timing. Perfect wording. Perfect preparation. Perfect version of myself. But the harder I tried to be perfect, the harder everything became. Because perfection creates pressure. And pressure makes it difficult to think clearly, speak naturally, or trust yourself. The thought came back to me during a conversation at the gym with a girl who’s getting married soon. We started talking about weddings, planning, timelines—all the moving pieces that have to come together at once. She said that at first, she wanted everything perfect. Then eventually she shifted into: “Okay… maybe it just needs to be doable.” Then: “Maybe I can adjust here and there.” And finally she said: “It doesn’t have to be perfect. It just has to be good enough.” That phrase stayed with me. Not because it sounded like settling. Because it sounded like freedom. I think a lot of people misunderstand the phrase “good enough.” They hear: lower standards stop caring be mediocre But that’s not what this was. This was about removing pressure. And honestly, I realized I’ve done the same thing in my own life—especially during my job search. The harder I tried to perform a flawless version of myself, the more unnatural everything felt. What finally started changing things wasn’t becoming perfect. It was realizing I didn’t need to be perfect to move forward. I just needed to show up: prepared present willing to engage And that was enough. Not careless. Not lazy. Not settling. Just real. I’m starting to think there’s a difference between structure and rigidity. Structure helps you move forward. Rigidity makes you afraid to move unless everything is perfectly aligned first. And maybe that’s why some things feel so heavy for so long. Not because we’re incapable. But because we think we need certainty, perfection, or complete confidence before we begin. I don’t think “good enough” means lowering the standard. I think sometimes it means removing the pressure that’s preventing movement in the first place. And sometimes, that changes everything.
0 Comments
There’s a difference between thinking about going back to work…
and actually being back in it. Before, I spent a lot of time thinking about: what I could do what I should do whether I was ready Now I’m in it. And it feels different than I expected. Not harder. Not easier. Just… different. There’s a rhythm to working again. A pace. A structure to the day that you don’t really feel when you’re outside of it. And being back in that rhythm does something. It sharpens things. Decisions feel clearer. Tasks feel more defined. There’s less second-guessing and more doing. When I was outside of it, everything felt bigger. More uncertain. More open-ended. Now, things are smaller. More contained. More manageable. Not because everything is figured out. But because I’m in motion. That’s the part I didn’t fully understand before. You can think about something for a long time. You can try to prepare for it. You can question whether you’re ready. But being in it changes how you think. It doesn’t solve everything. But it gives you something solid to work with. And that makes a difference. I’m still figuring things out. That hasn’t changed. But it feels less like I’m trying to build something from scratch. And more like I’m stepping back into something that already exists. There’s something I didn’t expect when I started trying to move forward again.
I didn’t feel like myself. Not incapable. Not like I had nothing to offer. Just… out of practice. It felt like everything I had done before had been sitting for too long. Like it was still there—but not at the surface. I wouldn’t say I lacked confidence. I would say it felt: rusty a little dulled harder to access And I think that’s different. Because it wasn’t gone. It just hadn’t been used in the same way for a while. What helped wasn’t waiting to feel confident again. It was starting anyway. Preparing. Thinking through my experiences. Organizing what I had done so I could explain it clearly. Not perfectly. Just consistently. And as I started doing those things, something shifted. Not all at once. But gradually. It felt less like I was trying to “build” confidence… and more like I was reconnecting with something that was already there. The more I used it, the more it came back. And I started to see it differently: Confidence doesn’t disappear. It just moves out of reach when it hasn’t been used. Structure helped—but not because it replaced confidence. Because it gave me a way to access it again. A way to move. A way to think clearly. A way to keep going—even when I felt a little off. I’m still figuring things out. That hasn’t changed. But I don’t feel like I’m starting from nothing anymore. I feel like I’m picking something back up. And the more I use it, the more natural it feels again. One thing that surprised me when I started trying to rebuild my career is this:
Interviewing is a skill. I didn’t think about it that way before. I thought you either had the experience or you didn’t. But interviewing requires preparation. You have to think through your experiences, connect them to what’s being asked, and communicate them clearly. That alone has been humbling. Another thing I’ve noticed is that my confidence isn’t exactly where it used to be. Not because I’m incapable, but because stepping away from traditional work for so long changes how you see yourself—and how you begin to question how others might see you. There are moments where it feels like I’m starting behind. I don’t actually believe that’s true. But rebuilding means facing that thought anyway. This process has also been more unpredictable than I expected. There are more paths, more options, and more competition than I realized. I’ve found myself asking questions I didn’t have to think about before: Am I on the right path? Are there better ones I haven’t considered? Do I need stability first, or do I take a risk? One shift that has helped is realizing this: It’s not just about whether I’m right for the job. It’s also about whether the job is right for me. I’ve had interviews where I was grateful for the opportunity, but I could tell it wasn’t the right fit. Some environments felt limiting instead of something I could grow into. What I keep coming back to is this: I want work where I can help people move forward. That’s always been the part I’ve enjoyed most—talking with people, solving problems, helping them figure things out. At the same time, I’ve had to face the question of whether I set myself back by stepping away from full-time work. But when I look at it honestly, I know this: I didn’t spend those years doing nothing. I managed a household. I raised my kids. I handled logistics, decisions, and constant problem solving. That work just isn’t labeled in a way the workforce immediately recognizes. The challenge now is translating it. I also keep thinking about something I heard once—about someone who kept applying for jobs and nothing was moving. Eventually, she decided to build something of her own instead of waiting. That idea stuck with me. Not because it’s easy—but because it’s another path. Right now, I’m still figuring out the right direction. And I’m also being careful about how I move forward. Because sometimes the smartest move isn’t fast—it’s intentional. So what have I learned so far? Rebuilding a career isn’t just about getting a job. It’s about understanding your value again. Figuring out what actually fits. And making decisions—even when things aren’t fully clear yet. Mostly, I’m learning this: It’s not one big decision. It’s a series of small ones. And right now, that’s enough. |
Categories |